Whilst environmental education has fervently engaged the kind of ‘environmental identities’ it ought to endorse and strive to cultivate, the qualifier ‘environmental’ has been treated as problematic, whereas ‘identity’ has been largely treated as intuitive and unproblematic. As Payne (2000) notes: “There is a major ‘lack’ in the discourse of environmental education research. Too little in environmental education … has been said directly about ‘identity’” (p. 68). The lack to which Payne refers is an under-theorisation rather than a complete absence. This paper responds to the under-theorisation by focusing on the role of organisational discourse in identity construction and the preferred subject positions that are being constructed.
The paper analyses a corpus constructed from recruitment advertisements for environmental education positions placed with major Australian online recruitment agencies. Using Althusser’s theory of ‘interpellation’ (1977) as the overarching conceptual framework, the analysis employs content analysis (Crowl, 1993), critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 1995) and APPRAISAL (Martin & Rose, 2007; Martin and White, 2007) to analyse questions embedded within the advertisements. This facilitates the explication of the discursive construction of organisational versions of the preferred environmental education subject. The questions that are analysed invariably construct an affectual subject in this privileged textual location.
|Keywords:||Environmental Education, Critical Discourse Analysis, Recruitment, Identity, Gender|
Senior Lecturer in Contextual Studies, School of Education, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
There are currently no reviews of this product.Write a Review