Revisiting the Rational Choice and Rationality Debate in the Social Sciences: Is Theory Possible without Rationality?

By Bongo Adi, Kenneth Amaeshi and Paul Nnodim.

Published by The Social Sciences Collection

Format Price
Article: Print $US10.00
Article: Electronic $US5.00

Not only from outside economics, scathing criticisms of the rational choice and rationality assumptions on which much of the economists’ models are based have also come from within economics and have constituted a major source of disagreement among economists. Especially, the Austrian school of economics and philosophy distinguishes itself from mainstream economics on this basis. Various theories such as critical realism, holism, Marxism, historicism, functionalism, semiotics, or the praxeology of the Austrian school, have appeared to be alternatives to rational choice and a heated debate have waged on which should be seen as representing a more realistic paradigm of the study of acting human subjects, interacting with others and their environment. The aversion to rational choice stems from its alleged orientation to subjective rationality, instrumental rationality, mechanistic, logical and mathematical formalism, utility maximization etc. Pushed to extreme, rational choice posits a distorted picture of reality that is both mechanistic and destructive. But the same accusations could well be levied against each of the theories that seek to replace rational choice. This paper takes the radical position that the alleged distinctions between rational choice and its rival theories are more imagined than real. Using a metaphysical hermeneutic deconstruction of the conceptualization of “theoria”, this paper shows that the modern theory (“theoria”) of knowledge takes as its foundational axiom, the agency of the subjective intellect which presupposes rationality: Rationality is inseparable from theory and both are articulated in the scientific method. We argue that a true alternative to rational choice must therefore, be in effect, an alternative to the scientific method, which as Heidegger pointed out, is itself the “theory of the real”. The paper therefore, explores the essentiality of rationality in the modern conceptualization of theory and argues the impossibility of any modern theory to escape from subjective rationality of science insofar as it remains a theory – a theory of the real. So far as the scientific method is not simply a method, but the modern “theory of the real,” constructed in the aftermath of Cartesian and Kantian Copernican Revolution, any theory of science, whether relative to the “social” or the “natural,” qua theory, is necessarily scientific, methodic and turns on subjective rationality. Therefore, the distinction among competing theories of social science on the basis of rational choice and mathematical formalization have but little validity. We argue in this paper that any distinction worth making in epistemology of science should be between the primeval “theoria” of the pre-Cartesian and pre-Kantian metaphysics of being and the post-Cartesian and post-Kantian epistemology of science.

Keywords: Rationality, Rational Choice, Scientific Method, Social Scientism, Theory

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 6, pp.27-38. Article: Print (Spiral Bound). Article: Electronic (PDF File; 1.843MB).

Dr. Bongo Adi

Bongo Adi is a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) post doctoral fellow and lecturer in microeconomics at the University of Tsukuba, Japan. He holds a PhD in development economics and his research interests are on philosophy of the social sciences, poverty, norms, networks and applied nonparametric statistics.

Kenneth Amaeshi

Research Fellow, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Kenneth is a Research Fellow and a PhD candidate at Warwick Business School, The University of Warwick, United Kingdom. His research focuses on entrepreneurship, innovation and appropriation of intellectual property in trust-based regimes.

Prof. Paul Nnodim

Assistant Professor, Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts

Paul Nnodim teaches philosophy at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, MA, USA. He holds a PhD in Philosophy, English and American studies from Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. He is the author of a book about John Rawls’ theory of Justice (Rawls’ Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Athena 2004) and several scholarly articles.

Reviews:

There are currently no reviews of this product.

Write a Review